RE: Chemical evolution of amino acids and proteins ? Impossible !!
December 21, 2019 at 3:30 pm
(This post was last modified: December 21, 2019 at 3:31 pm by Abaddon_ire.)
(December 21, 2019 at 11:39 am)Otangelo Wrote: A intelligent designer creates through power, information input ( words ), wisdom, and will. But how exactly does this work ?And there's your problem. Science does not yet have a definitive explanation for how abiogenesis happened (although the are more than a few candidate hypotheses). Thus the correct scientific answer to abiogenesis is "We don't know (yet), but we have promising lines of research".
We don't know how exactly a mind might can act in the world to cause change. Your mind, mediated by your brain, sends signals to your arm , hand and fingers, and writes a text through the keyboard of the computer I sit here typing. I cannot explain to you how exactly this process functions, but we know, it happens. Consciusness can interact with the physical world and cause change. But how exactly that happens, we don't know. Why then should we expect to know how God created the universe ? The theory of intelligent design proposes a intelligent mental cause as origin of the physical world. Nothing else.
You are claiming to have a full explanation from out of nowhere with no supporting evidence of any kind. All you have is an argument from ignorance. You don't know how it could happen therefore it must be "GOD".
And besides, it has already been long established that amino acids (the building blocks of life) spontaneously form given the right conditions. As do lipids ( the constituents of cell walls) Which said lipids then go on to spontaneously form a cell wall of their lonesome merely by chemistry.
It seems clear that you are ignoring everything that science has already established simply to concentrate your attention those things science has not yet established. With those blinkers in place, you miss each and every step in the scientific process and it's progress.
Somehow, you seem stuck right the way back in the state of science in the 19th century as though nothing had happened since.
It is more than a little odd.