Agreed that Platinga's defense only supports limited theism; some sort of creator that would like for us not to suffer but is unable to do that and have free will too; not a truly omnipotent being. Defenses of the God of Theodicy seem to always involve sawing one of the legs off the 'theodicy stool'. At least Platinga is willing to give up omnipotence instead of omnibenevolence.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.