RE: [Quranic Reflection]: Hell and the ultimate fate of the universe
January 31, 2020 at 6:36 pm
(This post was last modified: January 31, 2020 at 6:39 pm by WinterHold.)
(January 31, 2020 at 9:41 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(January 31, 2020 at 9:09 am)Brian37 Wrote: The Koran IS NOT a science textbook. It is an old book of mythology, just like the Bible , Jewish OT and Hindu Bagavad Gita..
NOBODY, absolutely NOBODY in antiquity had any lick of modern scientific knowledge.
I can't begin to count how many times since 2001 online how many Christians, Jews, Buddhists and even once a Hindu, who argued their holy writings match science.
SCIENTIFIC METHOD, is not a religion, it is a neutral tool. It is not there to prop up any holy writing of any religion.
It's perfectly possible for 'holy writings' to match science. However, these instances are pretty trite, not predicative, and the matches are either coincidence or based on simple observation. As an example (there are plenty of others) Ecclesiastes 11:3 states that 'if the clouds are full of rain, they empty themselves upon the earth.' Even without knowledge of meteorology, this pretty obviously matches what science says.
Boru
The Hebrew bible contains divine revelations, but also contains human forgeries, just like the Roman bible.
The Quran though, is the last pure revelation remaining.
To test each book; it must be 100% correct in each verse, even 99% means that the book is not pure.
The Quran is 100% correct, unlike the bible which fails in this test.
I don't believe that making "blind assumptions" towards very sensitive scientific matters is "a strike of luck that magically work".
That's quite absurd in my opinion.