RE: Agnosticism IS the most dishonest position
February 16, 2020 at 2:27 pm
(This post was last modified: February 16, 2020 at 2:27 pm by R00tKiT.)
(February 15, 2020 at 9:33 am)Abaddon_ire Wrote: Consider ceasing to do it.
Are you dumb or what. Confusing science with religion is always a colossal mistake no matter what you think of religion.
Consider ceasing to defend a stupid mistake.
(February 15, 2020 at 9:33 am)Abaddon_ire Wrote: "Again"? Really? When has any deity been proven?
"proven" is a really vague word. The only question worth asking is : what kind of proof would convince you of God? Is it directly witness a huge entity coming down the sky and resurrecting the dead ? or something else ?
(February 15, 2020 at 9:33 am)Abaddon_ire Wrote: And you stupidly assume there exists a burden of disproof. That is false.
Yes there is a fucking burden of disproof. Isn't that your job as atheists to disprove all kinds of claims made by religious people. Just do this one fucking job right.
If five hundred people tell you there is a rocket launched and directly aimed at your house, you better check the story and get your family out.
(February 15, 2020 at 9:33 am)Abaddon_ire Wrote:(February 15, 2020 at 9:15 am)Klorophyll Wrote: Go back to school, sir. The first building blocks of any domain in mathematics are axioms we picked. All the theorems, lemmas and fantastic insights are logical deductions we do in our heads.Still false.
(February 15, 2020 at 9:15 am)Klorophyll Wrote: Riight, ignorant. Apparently, the rule of three was enough for Einstein to formalise general relatvity.
Also false. I have no idea which planet you come from, but it isn't this one
I'm starting to think you never took a science class [seriously].