Agnosticism IS the most dishonest position

[R00tKiT]

Of course there’s a midpoint (or at least another option): There is an all powerful, all knowing just deity who, for reasons knowable only to itself, has opted not to reveal itself.  Intellectually, this would make agnosticism a perfectly respectable position to take, and not in the least dishonest.

Boru

The deity you're talking about is also just ( an unjust deity is a useless concept ). And as such, it cannot have left poeple before us completely lost and without any way of reaching an impartial truth about its existence. It's not fair that a deity will reveal itself in the future, because all poeple who lived before this moment missed the revelation. And there is no way to solve this problem even with very loose theological arguments.