(February 16, 2020 at 2:47 pm)Klorophyll Wrote:(February 15, 2020 at 5:23 pm)Ranjr Wrote: It's not a creed on it's own. It's the avoidance of a creed.
It's cowardice in an embellished way.
(February 15, 2020 at 5:23 pm)Ranjr Wrote: Agnostic means without knowledge.
We already know our universe balances on a knife-edge of extremely unlikely conditions. If this doesn't point for someone to a creator, he is an absolute twit. Case closed. End of story.
This is the only knowledge skeptics need to stop their retarded maneuvers around that.
(February 15, 2020 at 5:23 pm)Ranjr Wrote: Religions require faith because they can't offer certainty.
Who mentioned religions in any way? We're discussing the existence of the God with the three-omni properties, the only interesting deity all major religions care about. This particular deity either exists or not. A decisive and certain case can be made.
Your reply is empty of thought. There is no decisive and certain case for God. If there were, you could present it. Yet you can't. You are the dishonest one.
Given time, unlikely conditions occur on their own. That does not point to a creator. It points to your lack of understanding.
Otherwise, you cast worthless insults like a child.