Agnosticism IS the most dishonest position

[R00tKiT]

Given time, unlikely conditions occur on their own.

That's an attractive claim. Prove that to show you're not actually dishonest.
If you think billions of years of dust floating in the air will somehow produce complex information, let alone life, you might just need an equal amount of time in mental rehabilitation.

That does not point to a creator.  It points to your lack of understanding.

This is dumb, sir. Understanding a process is a separate issue. Why the process took place is the question we're interested in.

Otherwise, you cast worthless insults like a child.

Given the amount of batshit answers I'm receiving so far, I would call them facts.

---

...an unjust deity is a useless concept...

Says who?

An unjust deity by definition doesn't care about anything we do even it's righteous and justified. Therefore pursuing its existence is completely useless.

It's not fair that a deity will reveal itself in the future...

So what? If it's a god, it can do whatever the hell it wants to do.

If this deity is evil, it would love nothing more than to play mindfuck games with its creations.

You're right. And in this particular case, its existence is no longer an interesting question to ask. That's why the entire concept of god becomes meaningless once we omit the justness property.