RE: Agnosticism IS the most dishonest position
February 18, 2020 at 1:43 pm
(This post was last modified: February 18, 2020 at 1:52 pm by Abaddon_ire.)
(February 18, 2020 at 12:01 pm)Klorophyll Wrote:Just the one? OK. Paramārtha.(February 18, 2020 at 10:31 am)Gae Bolga Wrote: For as long as people have been writing about gods, people have been writing about not believing in them.
Okay, name a genuine nonbeliever in any god, one, in Muhammad's era. I'll wait.
One not enough now?
OK
Muhammad al Warraq, Ibn al-Rawandi, Al-Razi, Al-Maʿarri (he was fun)
5 not enough now? Want more?
You are a liar.
(February 18, 2020 at 12:01 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: If you mean by all-benevolent all-loving, then no, this is not one of the attributes all major religions agree on. The three-omni properties generally refer to : eternal, omnipotent and omniscient. Once stuff about love kicks in, which is essentially an attempt to anthropomorphise God, we can come up with all kinds of contradicitions, as is the case with the all-loving Christian God throwing Muslims to hell for eternal damnation. God in Islam is not all-loving, and this is explicitly mentioned in the Qur'an.
Sure. you can claim the three omnis are eternal, omniscient and omnipotent. It doesn't matter, those three still contradict each other.
Can god commit suicide, terminate his own existence? If yes, then not eternal. If no then not omnipotent.
The objections to omniscience and omnipotence remain the same.