RE: Agnosticism IS the most dishonest position
February 21, 2020 at 2:04 pm
(This post was last modified: February 21, 2020 at 2:06 pm by R00tKiT.)
(February 21, 2020 at 12:50 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: Yes, that Thomas Jefferson owned slaves was also evil, and human trafficking is illegal. I don't worship him either. I've already explained to you that I'm not a moral relativist, as such....the ambiguities of your own moral relativism aren't a problem for me.
And Muslims don't worship Muhammad either.
No, I need you to say : Thomas Jefferson would be in prison, just like you did with Muhammad. It's about time you acknoweldge your irrational repugnance toward his character.
And how can I possibly be a moral relativist. My book already proved capable to be a moral reference, or an inspiration, to a dozen of civilizations, if some practices are not done anymore, they disappear and that's it, they don't become evil. You, on the other hand, are a moral relativist. It's extremely unlikely that you would condemn slavery with the same assured tone if you lived hundreds of years ago. Religions don't condemn practices that were deemed obsolete, they just let them go. But you guys really need to shout them from the rooftops.
(February 21, 2020 at 12:50 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: If your magic book..or you, have mis-communicated your own faith in such a way that a correction would change my opinion of it..then yes, it is your fault, your magic books fault, and can only be you and your magic books fault.
No, it's just you seeing things as faulty. You're not prepared to back up any of your opinions about the religion, be it an alleged rape, or slavery, or conducting wars unjustly. It's not surprising you would not change your opinion, you're clearly too lazy to do it.