Agnosticism IS the most dishonest position

[LadyForCamus]

I think that you might have missed a few steps before that "therefore heaven"

I didn't intend for that to be a complete case for heaven, all I'm saying is that what's actually happening is what a just God would do, if he exists.

You're clearly working with a different definition of surprise.  I am not surprised to find that the necessities of existence are met, in the case of existence.  This state of affairs is tautologically expected to be true.  If some animal needs water, we expect to find water - but it doesn't matter whether a god put the water there or not.  However water came to be, if a creature that depends on water exists...water must exist.

That's a vacuous reasoning. You're not really saying much except describing some existent reality. And any really fine tuned universe will have the same tautologically true stuff you're talking about. 

...now, why this appears to be true in a natural universe is self explanatory

Again, you can say the same thing about a chair wired to fit the human body, and even derive your own chairtropic principle. None of that changes the fact that the chair was designed.

---

1. That the universe is fine tuned is a bald assertion, not an explanation.

And what would it take for you to acknowledge this fact? A golden skin?

And, what would it take for you to acknowledge an argument from ignorance fallacy? There are things on this planet that appear designed, but are not designed. Is a snowflake, or a crystal designed? There are also things on this planet that appear designed and are designed. Therefore, the appearance of design is not a valid indicator of actual design. “It’s just obvious” is not an argument; it’s an assertion. In order to reasonably conclude design, you need to provide evidence of a designer.