Agnosticism IS the most dishonest position

[The Architect Of Fate]

That's assuming you people have any moral compass whatsoever to begin with. Your fellow thought criminals had trouble elsewhere figuring out why senseless murder is immoral but killing millions of bacteria mercilessly when you shower is not. Go and read an argument or two against the existence of your morality.
And being vocal won't help you here.

I have a perfectly rational basis for my morality, based on the objective facts of the universe, and the goal of well being.

I can also explain why killing another human is immoral, yet killing millions of bacteria is not.

It's his morality that can't justify morality of any kind

---

Hawking says in the same book that philosophy has no more role in the world. When that book came out I was in the middle of a long and fascinating on-line discussion with a PhD philosophy student at the University of Chicago. I wish I had saved his impromptu rebuttal of Hawking's foolishness. People really shouldn't talk about things they have never studied.

And people who don't know what people have studied shouldn't talk about them  

Also a total ignorance of what philosophy does.

Nope a fine understanding simply a conclusion you don't like

---

You're lying, dear friend.

https://www.livescience.com/63854-stephe...o-god.html

Quote :

Hawking wrote. "For me this means that there is no possibility of a creator, because there is no time for a creator to have existed in."

He excluded any possibility of a god. It's exactly what "there is no god" means.

Repeat with me, atheists : Hawking said retarded, nonsensical shit about god.

While it is true, that this is a stronger statement than I have previously read by Hawking, he is not making a scientific claim. You do notice the phrase "for me", right? He is stating an opinion based on his scientific knowledge.

And no, he is not making "retarded, nonsensical shit about god", his position is based on the lack of: demonstrable evidence, reasoned argument, and, valid and sound logic to support the claim a god exists.

Your god claims are based on: ancient texts, indoctrination, flawed arguments.

Apparently Belacqua he all knowing thinks your ignorant and one of he greatest minds of our age who accomplished more in one decade then both these apologist morons combined  is a fool