RE: Agnosticism IS the most dishonest position
March 4, 2020 at 7:33 am
(This post was last modified: March 4, 2020 at 7:35 am by Peebothuhlu.)
So... Short reply belaqua. (In hindisght, maybe a not so short reply... 
)
Yes, I too agree that we can give defiitions to imagenary abstract (As wel as imagenary AND abstract) things.
That said, our imagenary ideas can't push back 'Directly' into reality.
We can't transplant Unicorns directly from our thoughts into reality.
On an aside, I would point out two reasonably well known artists.
H.R. Geiger and M.C. Escher.
The maths behind Escher's cretions is rather profound yet the images 'Came' to him with no education of maths.
Geiger's creations are also intrinsically 'Unique'.
I would haverd to make the point that the subtle differences in how Human brains 'Wire' themselve during development effect how such creative processes 'Work'.
Sorry for the obtuse possibly ramble.
It's been a stressful day at work and am venting ideas possibly as a way of decompressing the stress.
Much cheers to all.
Not at work.
)Yes, I too agree that we can give defiitions to imagenary abstract (As wel as imagenary AND abstract) things.
That said, our imagenary ideas can't push back 'Directly' into reality.
We can't transplant Unicorns directly from our thoughts into reality.
On an aside, I would point out two reasonably well known artists.
H.R. Geiger and M.C. Escher.
The maths behind Escher's cretions is rather profound yet the images 'Came' to him with no education of maths.
Geiger's creations are also intrinsically 'Unique'.
I would haverd to make the point that the subtle differences in how Human brains 'Wire' themselve during development effect how such creative processes 'Work'.
Sorry for the obtuse possibly ramble.
It's been a stressful day at work and am venting ideas possibly as a way of decompressing the stress.
Much cheers to all.
Not at work.
