RE: A possibly new perspective on this thing that we know as God.
March 5, 2020 at 6:17 pm
(This post was last modified: March 5, 2020 at 6:19 pm by unityconversation.)
(March 5, 2020 at 6:12 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote:(March 5, 2020 at 5:12 pm)unityconversation Wrote: All animals can display some the names and attributes of God, but on a low level. It is only the human animal that can potentially display "all" of the names and attributes of God, at the highest level.
Is any of that a fact? I think that the only thing happening here, is that a human being is telling me how awesome human beings are.
I'd caution you against predicating your god beliefs on such inanity. That doesn't have to be true, for there to be some god..and if that being untrue rendered your beliefs false..then it would be a self inflicted wound.
Well, human beings are awesome, you don't agree with that?
The human being is awesome because we are the only ones that have a divine nature / reality.
(March 5, 2020 at 6:15 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:(March 5, 2020 at 6:02 pm)unityconversation Wrote: There is no theoretical problem with islam and the baha'i faith.
All of the divine revelations has come to the world in different time periods, that means that whatever was taught by the past revelations, those revelations was suited for that particular time and age. And the teachings was taught according to the capacity of the people of the time. The thing is that the social teachings has to be tweaked or even downright changed according to the time and age it's revealed. But it is the spiritual principles, such as "do unto others as you would do unto yourself," that never changes. So islam itself is a revelation of old and is not relevant for our time and age.
Baha'u'llah already talked about the true meanings of when Prophet Muhammad said "seal of the prophets".
Heaven and hell doesn't mean what you think it means ether.
Physical evidence?
What other type of evidence is there?
Reasonable evidence, spiritual evidence.
