RE: A possibly new perspective on this thing that we know as God.
March 10, 2020 at 6:28 pm
(This post was last modified: March 10, 2020 at 6:39 pm by LadyForCamus.)
(March 10, 2020 at 6:08 pm)unityconversation Wrote:(March 10, 2020 at 5:48 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Do you know what circular reasoning is? This is both your initial premise and your conclusion. That’s not how it works. Your argument is fallacious. You need to go back to the drawing board.
It only gets repetitive and fallacious because you deny the concepts and evidence that I've been saying.
Like I said, that's fine. You have to understand I'm not here to try and change someone's mind. This is just something that I'm sharing.
You: “These qualities are unique to humans, therefore they’re divine.”
Me: “How do you know these qualities are divine?”
You: “Because, they’re unique to humans.”
Can you see the circle? There’s no point in debating the truth of your premise, because even if I grant it for the sake of the argument, your structure is still invalid.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
