RE: A possibly new perspective on this thing that we know as God.
March 10, 2020 at 7:59 pm
(This post was last modified: March 10, 2020 at 8:03 pm by unityconversation.)
(March 10, 2020 at 6:15 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:(March 10, 2020 at 6:08 pm)unityconversation Wrote: It only gets repetitive and fallacious because you deny the concepts and evidence that I've been saying.
Like I said, that fine. You have to understand I'm not here to try and change someone's mind. This is just something that I'm sharing.
No. You’re merely asserting that these human characteristics are divine; not demonstrating that. You’ve baked your conclusion into your argument. So, you’re sharing a fallacious argument with a bunch of atheists. Gee, thanks.
We demonstrate them all the time ladyforcamus.
What more need to said? What do you mean by "demonstration?"
(March 10, 2020 at 6:28 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:(March 10, 2020 at 6:08 pm)unityconversation Wrote: It only gets repetitive and fallacious because you deny the concepts and evidence that I've been saying.
Like I said, that's fine. You have to understand I'm not here to try and change someone's mind. This is just something that I'm sharing.
You: “These qualities are unique to humans, therefore they’re divine.”
Me: “How do you know these qualities are divine?”
You: “Because, they’re unique to humans.”
Can you see the circle? There’s no point in debating the truth of your premise, because even if I grant it for the sake of the argument, your structure is still invalid.
You said: "How do you know these qualities are divine?”
Because only the human being have them and because the Prophets / Messengers / Manifestations talks about them and because we actually demonstrate them all the time.
If you deny that, then that's fine.
