Agnosticism IS the most dishonest position

[R00tKiT]

Why?  Why would it indicate a problem in a harm based system..if, when harm is not present, a thing is not contended to be wrong?  is wrong™ about their relationships?

There are good reasons why we should consider open relationships wrong. You say there are some case where they don't violate commitment, I would say this detail is irrelevant, because on average, it does.

On average, one would expect someone to care less about his spouse with a third party around. It's something tautological, more individuals to be committed to means less attention to each individual.

Yes, think this stuff through.  If and when a caring husband does prefer more than one partner...-and- that partner is okay with that - then what would be wrong™ about their relationship?

Again, you're inferring moral judgment from special cases. It might happen that a partner is okay with an open relationship, but we know that jealousy is the predominant theme with regards to marriage.

No. It isn't. What any two or three or ten individuals get up to in the bedroom is no business of yours, mine or religions. If there is no harm, then it is not immoral.

Yeah, sure. Keep fucking. Just don't drive harrassment/rape statistics to unbearable levels.

There is no reason why a multi-partner relationship cannot be committed.

And there you go, backing up committed orgies  
I think this is one of the things you just need to keep to yourselves, there, in your countries.

That makes you sound like an inexperienced virgin child. "The gentle sex"? Fucking really? I have had partners who wanted to do things I refused to engage in. Women.

The "gentle sex"? Like hell they are.

You are a virgin.

English isn't my native language, maybe I should've framed that differently. Too bad women aren't regarded that highly, though, in your secular, modern moral system.