(April 1, 2020 at 3:24 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: To falsify the idea of falsification with respect to your silly god...you would have to assert that there is no god claim, which, if true, would necessitate some other claim be false.
Good luck simpleton.
You already believe this. That's why you're an apologist. There would be no need to ret-con magic book's claims with reality if this were not the case. Go ahead..argue with me...prove me right.
one falsification is the other thread.
two falsification here only proves you can not use science here in this argument, as science is not equipped/not the correct field of study to have this discussion.
What i have proved here is you need to watch the video and stop pretending you understand the topic. several of your atheist buddies understand the nature of the argument if you can not listen to me ask one of them. As it is you are in over your head on this one. (which most of you are which is why i made the video)
