(April 17, 2020 at 3:38 pm)Fake Messiah Wrote: So first you claim that there's nothing bad in Hadiths but that some people don't know how to read them, and then you dismiss Hadiths as not authentic and non reliable. So again you are being dishonest and contradict yourself. The only person you are lying to is yourself.
Clearly, you have absolutely no conception of the authenticity of hadiths, namely, that there are different levels of authenticity. The one you're mentioning is on the top bottom. And my guess would be you didn't even read the hadith you're referring to..... am I right?
Until you do some research, I suggest you refrain from defending this nonsense, you just don't know what you're talking about.
(April 17, 2020 at 3:40 pm)Mr Greene Wrote: He was charged with treason vs. the US. That would in effect be military opposition.
Still, it's difficult to compare his case to Muhammad's. It's already clear to academics how Joseph Smith composed his book. Regarding Muhammad, I was looking for good explanations of his revelations for years now and I found nothing compelling.
