(October 24, 2011 at 9:19 am)lucent Wrote:(October 24, 2011 at 8:34 am)DeistPaladin Wrote: OK, one more time. Saying "three distinct persons, one being" is not an explanation.
Why not? I bet conjoined twins have no trouble understanding this concept.
Marvelous example of design by a friendly god that's watching over everything, as an aside.
Back to the discussion, conjoined twins are not one being nor are they one person. They are two beings with one conjoined body. If some mad scientist were to stitch the two of us together, we'd still be two beings.
Quote:He didn't set it aside.You said he did.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
