RE: A.S.K. your way to proof.
April 19, 2020 at 7:39 am
(This post was last modified: April 19, 2020 at 8:32 am by Bucky Ball.)
(April 18, 2020 at 11:06 pm)LastPoet Wrote:(April 17, 2020 at 10:34 am)arewethereyet Wrote: I am sure Bucky is really hurt by your snub.
Buck respects people who deserve respect. Liars tend not to be on that list.
Nope, siding with satan here, bucky does not give himself respect. Ya know my memory, it works. I joined a convo about free will, over AD and suffice to say, I was met with nothing but 5 yo replies from bucky. You know I have a good memory. He and Drich are made for eachother, for all I care they could both fuck eatchother into oblivion.
No one on that thread posted any evidence for free will. They still haven't. It pissed you off I happen to know what I was talking about, and that I actually HAD evidence for what I was saying. You couldn't handle the actual science, and someone disagreeing with you. I stand by everything I said there, and here. In fact that thread came down to "well, even if 5% of human decision making is "free", we still have "free will". (LOL) I posted many scientific links that proved the consensus of neuro-science was behind the position I took. You, ... posted no support for anything. Apparently your memory is actually not all that good, after all.
You said on AD :
Quote:Anyone that says free will doesn't exist is either lying or ignorant about simple facts of biology and ultimately physics. Someone that needs to understand these subjects instead of whoring philosophy more than it has already been, philosophy is only useful when tied with facts.
A broad, ignorant, and unsupported (in any way) assertion.
Your position was fundamentally opposed to the consensus in neuro-science, which I provided numerous times, in referenced links. You asked me to supply the position of every electron in a brain. The fact is, you fundamentally do not get that if what you are implying is actually true, you would not have woken up the same person you are now, as you were yesterday, as the positions of every particle in your head CHANGES every nano-second, (or more often). Your question about electrons implies that their positions is actually relevant to the questions at hand. MEMORY IS NOT FORMED AT THE ATOMIC LEVEL, and specifically NOT at the level of electrons. The question belies a fundamental ignorance of the science of the brain. You never made that link, or posted any support for the implication. You simply did not (and do not) know what you're talking about. Too bad you can't tell the difference between someone who is trolling a forum, and someone who dares to disagree with a position you religiously hold, and fail to support, empirically. If you have some evidence, and references to professionals, post it, and I'll gladly look at it. It appears what had you butt-hurt, was that someone dared to question you. You never posted any scientific evidence to refute the multiple links and references I posted to support my position. If you did, I'll gladly look at them. I gave referenced replies. Your characterization of them as "yo" replies is a lie. Apparently you and Drich are the liars here. So ... you and he can go fuck yourselves into lie oblivion. I CHALLENGE you to post (what you think are) my "yo" replies here, ... and we'll see who is lying and who is not lying.
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell 
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist

Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist