(April 20, 2020 at 9:38 am)Mister Agenda Wrote:It also assumes there is something that can answer unlike the bridge .He seems to love bad analogies or comparisons .(April 16, 2020 at 1:06 pm)Drich Wrote: to whom would you a/s/k?
A/s/k would be an appeal to authority, to whom in authority could you ask that did not have the resources to check to see if you infact owned the bridge?
This stuff is deceptively complex, if you can get your head around it.
For starters, appeal to authority is a fallacy; so if that's what it is, it fails from the starting line.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
