A.S.K. your way to proof.

[Drich]

It should be called 'appeal to inappropriate authority'. An expert on a subject with a reputation for honesty can justifiably trusted to have good information on their topic of expertise, but they are not right because they are an authority, they are right because they put in the time to learn to understand the subject. You are justifiably trusting that they know what they are talking about because they earned their reputation.

Drich's method is a recipe for convincing yourself of anything you set out to convince yourself of; and if you do think you've made contact with his authority, all you've got is a voice in your head; and voices in your head do not have a reputation for honesty and subject matter expertise. You can use the same method to contact Vishnu or Athena; and whatever you think you've contacted YOU don't have the expertise to tell if it's real, just in your head, or something else.

if this is true, then why did Buddhism or Islam take when i set out to test those religions? Remember i started out with my mother as Buddhist.

---

Again if this were the case... why bring it up?

Too point it out 

but again why have me fix or take a way an advantage to you? it's not like you are tearing down my arguement by addressing the subject matter. look at this discussion. you only tactic is to attack me personally, so again why have me fix you only viable means of attack?

 why show your hand?

What hand? This isn't poker

i almost feel sorry for you.. your either pretty stupid or desperate to say anything as a come back. either way that comment reaks of desperation.

 my truly offering bad analogies only helps you,

Helps me do what?[/quote] fuel stupid little posts where you get to tell me about how bad my analogies are along with this not being poker. without that point of discussion none of this takes place.

 telling me will only have me strengthen my approach.

Good 

 or better yet refocus my efforts on a different way of sharing my point.

Good 

gain when there is no tactical reason for it, if this is just you compiling a list of my short comings, that is kinda the definition of bitching.

False .Someone can point out a shortfall of  something for no tactical reason and it not have it be bitching
[/quote] Sorry sport, but your ignorance of the word is shinning through here.
Bitching, (as it applies here):
verb (used without object)
Slang. to complain; gripe:
They bitched about the service, then about the bill.
2- To continuously complain about something

Without point or purpose your repeated notification become bitching.

---

Isn't creating content, and sparking interest and conversation enough?

LMAO. When did you plan on starting to do that ? 
You spew hatred and contempt. You do "retorts".
The only thing you *spark* is hatred of your ignorant religious shit. 

Please please please take me off probation. NOT. LOLOL
What a delusional idiot. There probably are pills for what ails you.

1