A.S.K. your way to proof.

[Drich]

It would be good if you fixed it , And i couldn't care less about this so called advantage . As i said i'm not playing games .

and if the anaology is not broken? what if it is simply your understanding of the world that will not allow you to see the simplistic for what it is?
put a pin in this we will come back to it when discussing your Einstein remarks.

This assumes my goal is tear something down .Rather than simply pointing something out . If you choose to fix it well good for you .

not an assumption but a critique of your past works, applied to this one.

 look at this discussion. you only tactic is to attack me personally,

Pointing your analogies are bad is not a personnel attack nor is pointing out your seeming love of using them  . You clearly looking at a very different conversation .

example? which analogies?

Einstein seemed to love using unrealistic and confusing analogies to express his ideas (pointing out something about  Einstein's methods not attacking him personally)

This i think is the core of your problem.. Einstein did not use unrealistic or confusing analogies. in fact he is credited in saying: that if one can not explain a concept simply then he himself does not truly understand the subject. I personally take the time to try and use the simplest explanation i possibly can to explain a precept. Or better yet i will take a parable of Christ and modernize it. So as to communicate using an analogy of Christ himself in a modern term or understanding. So again most of my work comes from Christ through the lens of Einstein's words on keeping things simple.

Here is a wiki page of his most popular analogies, without these dumbed down versions of his theories i would say 20% of the world Might be in a position to take his raw data and convert that to something they truly understand. Which brings us back to your problem. You see yourself as a standard of some sorts. you took t upon yourself to claim Einstein analogies were bad and overly complicated. The world at large does not agree. the world says his analogies are not only good be exceedingly simple and quite easy to understand given the scope of the nature of the subject matter. This means your judgement your knowledge base and your personal world view is over inflated. IE you are not in a position to judge an analogy good or bad for anyone but yourself. again your failure to recognize the genius in the simplicity of Einstein's work with analogies is absolute proof of this. yet here you are with the expertise of a true dunning-Kruger master making a judgement on a world renowned literal super genius, and then move to apply this same judgement to me.
Thank you i guess? as your bad seems to mean good for the rest of the world.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein%2...xperiments

Einstein was a stupid moron who used shit analogies to push his retarded nonsense because he was a fucking jew (personnel attack )

nice antisemitism..
Where are you hypocrites who want me to be kicked for portraying myself as Korean but let antisemitic remarks like this go? if you guys let this racial remark go, then know you are truly fake virtusignaling scum.



 so again why have me fix you only viable means of attack?

It would be good if you fixed it. I don't care about attacking at least not in this case .

not true as demonstrated it is all you have as you do not seem to be intelligent enough to speak topically. look at your last 5 posts to me. how much of what you said is about me and how much is of the actual topic? The primary body of your work are all personal attacks. without them you would have nothing to say topically. (again do not appear to be intelligent enough to have a non ad hom discussion.)

Sorry "Sport" 

Pointing out the shortfall that you make poor analogies is not  complaining it's pointing something out ,And i said no TACTICAL purpose .You can point out a fact without tactical reason but merely to point out the fact out and  doing so repeatedly is not bitching .So all you have done is quote a definition that doesn't apply to my comment.

To make the example apply to my comment 

They pointed out the food was undercooked .Then they pointed out the bills print wasn't legible.

Let's compare 

Sangula  pointed out Dirch makes terrible analogies that are ineffectual 

So to sum up my notifications to you pointing out the fact you make bad analogies is itself a point and a purpose .Even if i'm not doing it in some tactical ends .

So no tut tut to you

Are you serious? If you "under-cooked" analogy was what you consider to be a good analogy then i concede the whole argument.. my analogies are NOTHING like that, the mirror opposite infact. which means if you judged your mess good then mine have to be 'bad.'

but this is the bad by the standard of a admitted/proven antisemitic hate monger who can even see through his hate to give Albert Einstein his due. in fact he placed me in the same category as Einstein as far as my ability to provide a similar type analogy.

i'll take it.

---

This is what is known as an anecdote. Just because you wound up Christian doesn't mean the experience is typical of those who try it. Did you A/S/K Buddha first? Did he not answer? If so you did not try long enough or hard enough, eventually you'd have discovered Buddha is real.

This is the same standard you ask of us, to A/S/K for the rest of our lives or we find God, whichever comes first. Why didn't you use that standard with Buddha?

One does not "try out" religions. 
Yet another example of how fucked up this fool is. 
If one does try-outs, then it's neither about faith or religion. 
Not only is this ignoramus not a Christian, he's not even a theist. 
He's an opportunist.

1

Is that how high can you count ? 
Oh wait, you can go up to 5 now. 
Great. 
Now you can start spelling lessons. 


I'm sure his Jebus is real pleased with his work here, insulting those he wants to convert.
Good going.

2 and 3