A.S.K. your way to proof.

[The Architect Of Fate]

And if the anaology is not broken? what if it is simply your understanding of the world that will not allow you to see the simplistic for what it is?
put a pin in this we will come back to it when discussing your Einstein remarks.

No your analogies are bad and no i understand them well enough, And oh dear when we get to the Einstein stuff
 (thank goodness i had coffee before responding to this )

not an assumption but a critique of your past works, applied to this one.

No it's an assumption .One born of your faulty impressions of my work .As the rest of this will show

example? which analogies?

Why bother? Reading this response i can only assume you either don't take this seriously or are being obtuse by intent .So why should i dig back through your comments and subject myself to more dreck . Hell the only reason i'm making this response is because i refuse to let the narrative be yours .After this post i'm done .

This i think is the core of your problem.. Einstein did not use unrealistic or confusing analogies. in fact he is credited in saying: that if one can not explain a concept simply then he himself does not truly understand the subject. I personally take the time to try and use the simplest explanation i possibly can to explain a precept. Or better yet i will take a parable of Christ and modernize it. So as to communicate using an analogy of Christ himself in a modern term or understanding. So again most of my work comes from Christ through the lens of Einstein's words on keeping things simple.

Here is a wiki page of his most popular analogies, without these dumbed down versions of his theories i would say 20% of the world Might be in a position to take his raw data and convert that to something they truly understand. Which brings us back to your problem. You see yourself as a standard of some sorts. you took t upon yourself to claim Einstein analogies were bad and overly complicated. The world at large does not agree. the world says his analogies are not only good be exceedingly simple and quite easy to understand given the scope of the nature of the subject matter. This means your judgement your knowledge base and your personal world view is over inflated. IE you are not in a position to judge an analogy good or bad for anyone but yourself. again your failure to recognize the genius in the simplicity of Einstein's work with analogies is absolute proof of this. yet here you are with the expertise of a true dunning-Kruger master making a judgement on a world renowned literal super genius, and then move to apply this same judgement to me.
Thank you i guess? as your bad seems to mean good for the rest of the world.

Seriously how did you not get what i was doing ? I wasn't  making actually truth statement about Einstein i could have used anyone in my example .I was pointing out the difference between a personnel attack and a pointing out bad methodology because you accused  of personnel attacks . Though as a critique to myself i could have used quotation marks or explained that .But considering i have done this plenty without having to do that  so i didn't see a reason too .So you have written a long post that completely missed my point ,And no your Analogies aren't simple they are bad and not even close to Einstein or any other actual thinker

 nice antisemitism..
Where are you hypocrites who want me to be kicked for portraying myself as Korean but let antisemitic remarks like this go? if you guys let this racial remark go, then know you are truly fake virtusignaling scum.

I wasn't making an antisemitic comment i was giving an example of what a personnel attack on Einstein would look like .I imagine everyone else got that .

so again why have me fix you only viable means of attack?

I already answered this .This wasn't an attack .

not true as demonstrated it is all you have as you do not seem to be intelligent enough to speak topically. look at your last 5 posts to me. how much of what you said is about me and how much is of the actual topic? The primary body of your work are all personal attacks. without them you would have nothing to say topically. (again do not appear to be intelligent enough to have a non ad hom discussion.)

Actually at least in this series of comments i made no personnel attacks . All my comments have been about your methodology not you .

Are you serious? If you "under-cooked" analogy was what you consider to be a good analogy then i concede the whole argument.. my analogies are NOTHING like that, the mirror opposite infact. which means if you judged your mess good then mine have to be 'bad.'

That wasn't one of your analogies nor was i comparing it to one . I was taking the dictionary example you provided and modifying it to show the difference between what i was doing and your accusation of "bitching "

but this is the bad by the standard of a admitted/proven antisemitic hate monger who can even see through his hate to give Albert Einstein his due. in fact he placed me in the same category as Einstein as far as my ability to provide a similar type analogy.

Sigh as opposed to a guy who can't tell the difference a legitimate Antisemitic attack and giving  (a fictional ) example of what an Anti Semitic(personnel attack ) attack would look like  . As oppose to a guy who can't see a (fictional) comment on Einstein and thinks via that fictional comment i think he's on par with Einstein 

i'll take it. Great

Yes i'm sure your ego loved that .Too bad it's not what i said .


So to sum up you misunderstood  or intentionally misrepresented everything i wrote .Awesome 



And as my last response to you before go on ignore for a while for wasting my time 

Again sport religions provide what people are searching for.

Religion isn't a choose your own adventure book .It has very real metaphysical and  consequences many of which a totally incompatible .One of you is wrong and the other is right , And you have no means of telling a Buddhist you got it right .

 for Buddhist if they seek enlightenment over God then Buddhism will give him what he is looking for. What i'm saying is Buddhism is not of God. As God is not the only entity setting up religions.

Yup and you no way of telling him god is right (or your interpretation of god) is right and his enlightenment which contradicts many of your Christian beliefs is wrong because via personnel enlightenment he has as much proof as you do .Same goes for Muslims who would look at your story and declare you deceived and declare their experience the truth ,And you have no means to object as they have same evidence you do for a totally incompatible doctrine .

So there's nothing  you have said here a member of another religion couldn't throwback in your face with equal justification in favor of their specific exclusive doctrine .