RE: Atheist VS Naturalist - the latter sounds more appealing to me...
May 24, 2020 at 7:40 pm
(This post was last modified: May 24, 2020 at 7:43 pm by possibletarian.)
Of course you can't find anything you cannot show to exist in the first place, that's a no brainer.
1) Science works because it deals with things that can be shown to exist
2) Science does not deal with things or explanations that rely on things you cannot show to exist (how would it explore it ? )
3) Therefore it never finds anything you cannot show to exist. (by definition it can't)
Still we are left with the claim only, no progress has been made no matter how you present the supernatural.
1) Science works because it deals with things that can be shown to exist
2) Science does not deal with things or explanations that rely on things you cannot show to exist (how would it explore it ? )
3) Therefore it never finds anything you cannot show to exist. (by definition it can't)
Still we are left with the claim only, no progress has been made no matter how you present the supernatural.
'Those who ask a lot of questions may seem stupid, but those who don't ask questions stay stupid'
