RE: Atheist VS Naturalist - the latter sounds more appealing to me...
May 27, 2020 at 10:59 pm
(This post was last modified: May 27, 2020 at 11:04 pm by possibletarian.)
(May 27, 2020 at 10:42 pm)Belacqua Wrote: You of course don't want to type out coherent arguments to explain yourself, and that's fine. That's your right.
It seems, neither do you
Quote:The point is that if we discover various new things about the natural world, those are things about the natural world. It doesn't disprove the existence of the supernatural.
Well of course things we discover about the natural word are about the natural world, what we are concerned with is a coherent reason to jump to a non~natural world when we cannot find answers.
Quote: I have been arguing that the metaphysical commitments you have concerning the supernatural predetermine how you interpret empirical evidence, and determine whether you will entertain supernatural explanations
Perhaps give us a coherent reason to have metaphysical commitment to the non~natural ?
'Those who ask a lot of questions may seem stupid, but those who don't ask questions stay stupid'
