RE: Atheist VS Naturalist - the latter sounds more appealing to me...
May 29, 2020 at 12:52 pm
(This post was last modified: May 29, 2020 at 12:54 pm by Succubus#2.)
(May 29, 2020 at 4:04 am)Belacqua Wrote: I think we've about covered it. So I'll sum up. Whether anyone wants it or not.
...And since science is carried out by humans (despite its near divine status on this forum) if people can't comprehend it then science can't answer it.
...Unless someone wanted to define "natural" as "that which humans can know through empirical means." I think that would be a little unusual for science-type people, but not without precedent.
"Science-type people."
How very revealing.
Bel, why do you have such a hatred of science, or is it a fear of science?
I wonder is there a backstory to this or is it that science has written off your particular brand pseudo philosophy for the worthless drivel that it is.
Plato forbid you ever go down with kidney stones but when you make it to a hospital you'll embrace science right enough.
Miserable Bastard.
