(October 26, 2011 at 9:43 am)salty Wrote: A person need only go back to your restricted examples of drunkness and sex to see that you have little understanding of what freewill means and a weak basis for how it is used.
In the homosexuality thread I did not state any new information about the body, instead I held the information as my opinion for why the behavior was not correct.
How does that in any way contradict what I was saying? I was giving you examples of when people argued your point rather than calling you names. For fuck's sake, if you can't keep up with your own arguments, no wonder we're having communication issues. You said you needed examples of people arguing against your ideas, I gave them to you. Your weird attempt to change the subject makes no sense. I even asked you the question 'Was that people attacking you or your argument?' to help you along, and you still managed to lose track.
Explain how I have little understanding of free will. How can you possibly argue the point that if you are required to act within already set out parameters, that this is not free will? That is EXACTLY WHAT IT MEANS.
Believe me, you have been, and are being treated fairly. You just managed to lose your own train of thought between two posts. I don't think using finger puppets to explain things to you would be unfair in the least.
