RE: Kenosha Shooter Kyle Rittenhouse
September 10, 2020 at 3:56 pm
(This post was last modified: September 10, 2020 at 4:23 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
(September 10, 2020 at 4:48 am)Angrboda Wrote:Because in the context of intent and design it is a single use item . Though it could be multi use in the context of pragmatic use . As for the context being ancient China . Why not ? And even if not it's clear firearms were generally used for military purposes early on . I really don't how this is controversial or problematic and as i said i can agree to disagree .(September 10, 2020 at 4:05 am)SUNGULA Wrote: My only conclusion if we consider the original intent and design this it a single use . Now in practical use it could be multi use (technically anything could be multi use ).Really it comes down to context which is why i agree to disagree with Brian because i think both of us are technically right
Okay, and why would we consider the original intent and design when determining whether or not it is a single use item? (Btw, the "context" in question isn't 12th century China.)
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
