what is the point?

[Drich]

oskar schindler was not a very good nazi as he save a couple thousand jews from death camps.. the project valkyrie guy who tried to blow up hitler, good god fearing man who was also a bad nazi.. there are many examples of good christians/bad nazis... are you completely oblivious to history and film?

I'm completely oblivious to what YOU personally mean by 'good Nazi' or 'bad Nazi' until you clarify yourself. The majority of good Nazis were Lutherans and Catholics. The bad Nazis were people of rare conscience, unfortunately.

actually no. all nazi followed positive christianity. not an option. this is where one of hitlers guys/minister of religion rewrote the bible and the rule for the church.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_Christianity  of which ss officers high ranking officals and their families and gestapo were not allowed to attend. if you go back to the post i made that has the red letter outline this will show what the church real was hitler's plan to end it.

that said a good nazi is someone who has no problem being as evil as the nazi tell them to.. a bad nazi would be a good people caught up like oscar schindler who saved jews.

---

---

actually, if your beliefs were as they are supposed to be.. and if you took a hard line in the sand on certain topics. you too would be chew up and shat out like the other dozen or so christians who all left a few years ago all at the same time. again maybe your too new to remember people like catholic lady and froods and there was another who all told me if i just stoked a few egos and as you said work on my personality, they would all come around.. the truth of the matter is these guys/atheists (some) are crazy smart. smart than most christians. way smarter than anyone willing to compromise any part of their beliefs. they will start out with things that any christian does not see as a mandate to be a christian. dietary law holy-days worship ect.. looking for common ground to be buddy buddy with you..  then over time start to press in on christian matters, just when you think you have a friend.. then they will chip and chip at your beliefs to either you stand up and say no, that a sin (at which point they turn on you and treat you no differently than they treated me.) which was devastating to some of the kinder hearted people. 

or you compromise and continue to do so till you are christian by name only.. I know this because there were at least 12 christians and we talked alot about how things went down, who since left here and again 3 or 4 of which were the nicest people who compromised way way too much and way too often for my beliefs, but they thought they could convert a friend... they were right, they just did not think they were the friend... 

so again sport if you missed it in the op, and again here this is not about me alone. this was one of the best websites because of it's diversity, and freedom to express... and now it's fading fast.. as far as your own person experience in not having issue with these guys at all. you must be hotter and better mannered than catholic lady, funnier than froods and smarter than that other guy..  or your beliefs are not a threat to them as they align themselves with what they believe. ( at which point you become the token joke) We are told this world is not our home we are told if we follow god our ways will not be their ways, and if they did not spare his son they would not give us quarter/spare us. if you have found quarter/mercy with those who are of this world.. then perhaps you should take another look at your connection to god...

---

It's still diverse and you are free to express. I have had issues at times with individuals. I'm not funny, hot or smart. You're correct that my beliefs aren't a threat to them. It's not because I'm only a Christian by name, but perhaps it could be that I don't present my beliefs in a threatening way, threaten people, belittle people or compare people with nazis and other nasty things. I knew Fr0d0 from way back and he and I got along swimmingly. Many an atheist and I have simply agreed to disagree, some have rekindled their interest in a relationship with God, some have solidified their hard atheism. It's absolutely fine (and I feel critical in a healthy Christian walk) to stand firm in the Lord, but the battle is not ours, nor are we fighting the flesh sacks that type on keyboards here. Sponges don't shape or chip away rocks. There is no compromising of beliefs necessary to exchange ideas and share beliefs. I do look at my connection with God, everyday. I pray every day and I read my Bible every day (ish). I also look at my relationships with people and realize that my actions and words are part of my testimony and are a witness to all of my relationships in life.

My beliefs are what they are. All of my lines in the sand are from my understanding of scripture through the Holy Spirit. I don't think one single atheist on this site has ever wanted to be buddy buddy with me. That doesn't mean I haven't shared a bite to eat or a mutual respect, or a mutual love of sci-fi with some of them, because I have. That doesn't mean we're best friends and honestly what you describe above seems like your pandering to be elected class president or being socially manipulative. My views will most likely never align with at least one of every atheist's view. That doesn't mean they can't align on other things. Thanks for your concern about my Spiritual walk. Good luck with you in yours.

and what of those who do not like or respond well to your passive approach? what of those who will simply not engage at all? are they condemned to hell just because to them you do not seem genuine, connected, or dispassionate about your own beliefs? after all if this eternal life and death we are speaking of how can some people consider you seriously, if you broach a subject on the same level as needing an oil change in your car?? not to say everyone must share my passion or that of a hell fire and brimstone preacher, but what of those souls who do? would you gladly see them to hell because they do not fit your mold of christian behavior or appreciate your teaching style? have you read enough of your bible to get to the teaching from part that describes the body of christ/the church as a body who is made up of different parts? do you understand the meaning of this teaching? when he compares some of us to an eye, and how the eye worships or contributes to the body will obviously be different than how an ear serves the body.. in your mind and in your heart do you truly believe that all members of the body need to worship and represent the body as you do? that no other members of the body will be welcome into heaven just because say if you were a hand they do not worship as a hand.. let say your a kind hand who's job is to be extended when peace and mercy is to be shown.. let then say i am a foot who is used to kick the asses of those who do not respond to the hand. not only that i am to be a working model of other feet, if and when they come to worship or contribute to the body? or would you forsake "feet" from being apart of the body? then who are you as a hand in christ to judge how a foot worships? granted my worship does not mirror your own, that's because i am designed differently and perform a different function than you do. but does that make me any less apart of the body of christ? If you have truly examined yourself and where you are with god and are comfortable with what you know and where you are at yet see a problem with me... then perhaps your comfort is the next thing you should work on. because if paul/the bible make provision for people to worship in polar opposite ways and this disrupts your sense of the church... (despite what the bible says about it) then it is you and your 'walk' that should be reexamined first.
That said frodo was a nice guy.. guess what happened to him. bann for turning on his atheist buddies. he took a proper stand i forgot on the subject, and they all turned on him and he went off on all of them, he was trivially warned and lashed out again.. then gone. the other thing you do not seem to want to consider is like i said in the op. these are not my words or feelings. about a dozen christian all left in a mass exodus a few years back all of which chose to worship and minister as you do. a few of them even asked me or told me if i was not so harsh i could have a bunch of friends here. they all left because the attitudes here changed and they were targeted and pressured to the point they could not worship and minister as buddies so they left. yet i remain. again my plea for these guys is for the sake of the website. and new christians who may want to join. nothing but an outright ban will affect me here. as i know what and why i'm here and being friends while i can be open to is not my primary goal. My primary goal is to provide biblical truth, to answer questions and or to correct unsound theology.

---

---

i have plaque psoriasis and vitiligo  (What made michael jackson white)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitiligo  I spelled it and auto correct changed it to infantigo

---

point i am making 1 day here 8 pages of dialog. not all of it the same mundain crap over and over like all the rest of the stuff i see posted. if you want this thing to work... live and let live. not saying we can have blow out fights.. find and repect each other boundries.

There is no way that your spelling was autocorrected to a word that doesn't exist.  A reach would be that you meant impetigo but that isn't vitiligo...so try a-fucking-gain you idiot.

mundane - respect - boundaries

infatigo is what i typed which was auto corrected to infantigo which is: https://www.doctorshealthpress.com/skin-...treatment/ 

why do you need be so nasty and sure of yourself when you have no idea what the hell happened on my said? why can't you ask how did you get from vitiligo to infantigo?

---

Either he doesn't understand you can't insult someone into agreeing with you, or he's only here to insult.  

He's nuts if thinks he will convert anyone.  Who would want to be like him?  He's hateful and unhappy.

i can how ever show someone that what they think is wrong with the same insulting demeanor used to tell me you are right. what you guys don't like is being treated like you treat other when you think you are right. so if you been shown to be wrong, an honest person with hat in hand this time seeks the truth. while a troll/liar/dishonest person will argue that they believe the lie. this shows me who to spend time on and who to put in check if needed.