If you really had faith in the chair's ability to hold you up the same way you have faith in god - I don't suppose you could be able to post a picture of you sitting in your chair, as EVIDENCE for its durability? (relax, this is hypothetical - I don't actually want a picture of a chair with you sitting in it.)
Now, can you do the same thing for god, if you really have in the same way faith in the durability of the chair while sitting in it?
Only way you escape your usage of faith is by modulating it, by using adjectives in front of it. Here: "reasoned", "blind", "unwavering", "delusional", "irrational".
That you can't see the qualia difference in faith in gods distinctly apart from the existence of chairs and their durability, merely tells me just how dark and deep into the ocean of faith goes. Better bring a pressure diving suit.
---
Yes, I think you're a liar, and you have given me sufficient reason to support that accusation from your non-trivial use of the term 'faith' in equivocating your faith in god as being on the same conceptual level as durability of a fucking chair.
Now, can you do the same thing for god, if you really have in the same way faith in the durability of the chair while sitting in it?
Only way you escape your usage of faith is by modulating it, by using adjectives in front of it. Here: "reasoned", "blind", "unwavering", "delusional", "irrational".
That you can't see the qualia difference in faith in gods distinctly apart from the existence of chairs and their durability, merely tells me just how dark and deep into the ocean of faith goes. Better bring a pressure diving suit.
---
Yes, I think you're a liar, and you have given me sufficient reason to support that accusation from your non-trivial use of the term 'faith' in equivocating your faith in god as being on the same conceptual level as durability of a fucking chair.
