(September 24, 2020 at 10:45 am)Brian37 Wrote:(September 24, 2020 at 10:38 am)HappySkepticn9 Wrote: It isn't a prosecutor's job to charge people with anything they "could" possibly be charged wtih. They have a duty to only charge if they believe the evidence and law supports a charge, and that there is a reasonable chance of conviction. Anything else is prosecutorial misconduct.
Yea, the old saying goes, "A grand jury can indict a ham sandwich".
Which is why this ruling is bat shit insane. If the prosecutor is willing to go after the cop's bullets who disturbed the neighbors, but not he other cops's bullets that killed Breonna?
It is also NOT the job of a grand jury to convict. A grand jury's job is to consider if there is enough evidence to pass on to a court trial.
I don't see how the logic works that other bullets constitute a passing on to a trial for one cop because he didn't hit Breonna, but the other 6 that did hit her and killed her get a "meh well, what or you going to do"?
That's because you are gun ignorant and refuse to learn the laws, responsibilities and realities of firearms and firearm ownership.
It's what makes your bleating about the subject particularly annoying.
