RE: Why you should fear Trump's pick for Supreme Court Judge
October 13, 2020 at 4:02 pm
(This post was last modified: October 13, 2020 at 4:14 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:In other words - you approve of what Trump has done - stack the deck as it were...Punishing the Republicans for trying to cheat isn't stacking. Thou i don't agree with it adding more judges to balance the number and prevent ideological domination is better .
Quote:You just want to stack it YOUR way....Nope he put it in terms of punishment not policy
Quote:Restriction on RELIGION.No it freaking isn't . The amendment says can't establish or deny the practice of religion . Neither of those things are happening, And i go further to say the question of whether one can be an impartial and non partisan judge can be asked in the context of religion without being about personnel practice of religion. This is not a religious test but a test of professional integrity .
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM