Aren't Judaism and Aryanism the same thing?

[Rev. Rye]

1: They both believe in a masterrace to rule the world You'd think that a group centered around world domination would have at least tried to focus on areas other than the one part of the Middle East that doesn't have oil.
2: They look down upon NonJews(Goyim)/Jews. As a rule, not anymore. For the most part, the Jewish people have assimilated, and most of the world has come around to the idea that Anti-Semitism is bad, therefore there's really no need to. Things may be different in Israel, but if that's what you're talking about, keep your claims specific and to the point.
3: Writings of how inferior they are compared to the chosen ones Invariably written when they were living in areas where they were surrounded by Gentiles who hated and feared them and would kill them if they could get away with it. And when that's your only exposure to others, of fucking course you're going to end up like that.
4: One is a religion the other never developed into one Well, Aryanism technically doesn't center around a deity or the teachings of a certain teacher.
5: Even if Jeans was made by Jews and cool Uniforms was made by nazis, that still doesnt mean that i have to like them ideologically A fair point, I guess?
6: Germans were good at warfare, Jews however werent good at warfare historically Germans being good at warfare? It's complicated, given that they were able to soldier through two world wars, but ever since 1871, they only actually won when they were A) a smaller part of a larger coalition like NATO, or B) Putting down uprisings, usually in places like Africa. As for the Jewish people? Well, for the most part, they weren't an organised force, at least between 70 AD and 1948. Once Israel comes into being, just look at Wikipedia's "List of Wars involving Israel." They have unambiguously lost exactly once.
7: Germany for Germans, Israel for Hebrews. America for Americans, Arabia for Arabs. So, when you say America for Americans, do you mean the native people or the white guys who decimated their numbers and reduced them into poverty?
8: Politically one dont need to hate people for their background, but why should one racist ideology be accepted, and only one hated? When they are both the same The origins of one might be more understandable than the other, but in the long-term, all hateful ideologies should be rooted out.

---

When you mean white supremacy. Do you mean people who believe Caucasians are superior types of people, or the type who just likes western culture and appreciates it and wanna take part in the country they live in?

If the latter sees people who don't look like them trying to appreciate and take part in Western culture and living in the same country as them (say, Syrians in Sweden doing much the same things as native-born Swedes) as a threat or otherwise a bad thing, there's no real point in differentiating them from the former.

Case in point, imagine a Swedish guy named Oscar Andersson. He’s just a guy who likes his culture and wants to take part in it. Now imagine a Syrian named Mohammed Khalid, who fled Syria during the war and wound up living in Sweden. He’s lived there long enough that he’s grown to appreciate the same things Oscar does. If Oscar sees Mohammed’s interest in his adopted culture as a threat or a bad thing, then he’s just as much a racist as the guys who outright state that outright state Caucasians are a superior people.