(December 21, 2020 at 9:40 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(December 21, 2020 at 9:31 pm)Brian37 Wrote: Um no, Flynn wasn't defending dissent, he was defending blind loyalty.
Flynn would have defended the King if he had been alive during the Revolutionary war.
Where did I say Flynn was defending dissent? And even if he was defending blind loyalty, it STILL isn’t seditious.
If you’re going to disagree with me, try to make sure you’re disagreeing with something I actually said.
Boru
You are spitting hairs here.
Is it legal for a politician to slight, besmirch, smear a rival? YES, that has always happened.
But there is a huge difference between accepted fray, and downright undermining.
You cannot say that Trump is employing the normal digs both parties throw at each other. Trump demands blind loyalty and that has nothing to do with policy disagreements.
