forbidding people to love each other

[Drich]

I was just looking at WLC’s essay on how gay people should not be in relationships, how AIDS is a punishment from God, how gay people should seek a cure to become "normal". Source

This makes me think how sad and pathetic do you have to be to be agitated by the existence of homosexuals?
And after all these centuries of novels and plays of forbidden love you would think people would get the OBVIOUS lesson that you can not forbid some couple to love each other. He is literally the most pathetic, saddest, and generic villain in the repertoire of villains who wants to prevent people to be happy.

Some of the stuff he writes:

Sexual “orientation” is no longer thought to be fixed and is not rigidly determined by our genetic makeup. There is no “gay gene.” Homosexual persons can develop heterosexual desires, just as heterosexuals, who have had a wife and children, can develop homosexual desires. [...]
Finally, if you are troubled by unwanted sexual desires, seek professional Christian counselling. Sexual desires are by nature very addictive. Whether those desires are adulterous, pornographic, or homosexual, in a country which respects freedom of speech, you should be free to pursue “talking-therapies” to help you. With time and effort, it may well be possible for you to come to enjoy normal, heterosexual relationships with your spouse.

Again, even if he is right about the genes (although he doesn’t seem to, and genes do seem to play the role) how mental do you have to be bothered if someone is happier in life if he/ she chooses a homosexual way of life?

if genes play a role please identify the gene sequencing (in common terms or cut and pate if you don't understand it doesn't matter)

(hint: you will not find anything) 

It kills me you guys are all about the science when it comes to go. "we must follow the science" but on everything else like gender, sexual orientation ect, even with covid, it's not about the science or even if someone like you has a need to follow it you will contradict/lie/create a narritive that says even though science has not identified a gay gene genetics is the reason...

how bout this little bit of hyprocrisy: science has identified something like 26 "fat genes" that predisposes you to be fat. yet there are no social protections for fat people. the same "group" who march and will die for gay rights will smash bash and fat shame some guy for being 100lbs over weight.. the excuse there is 'genes only provide conditions for it to be easier to become fat. "the genes don't put the hamburgers and twinkies in your mouth" yet the gene argument used against christianity is that this invisible gene or 'genetics (which goes against darwinism as all gay people would eventually have been bred out not increase) that puts 'bless do not curse' in their mouths.

again. you guys create a narrative and fill in the blanks with anything that supports you. you have no disposition to logic or truth. just facts you can us even just once if need be with no care or consideration to the source. this is literally what stupid people do.. comon guys i know at least 1/2 of you are smarter than that... Just like i know the other half will argue my point here.