RE: forbidding people to love each other
July 3, 2021 at 11:42 am
(This post was last modified: July 3, 2021 at 11:48 am by AkiraTheViking.)
(July 3, 2021 at 10:54 am)K-PopPowerBottom69 Wrote: God's existence is supported by deductive, analogical and inductive arguments.
An argument without proof is just that, an argument.
(July 3, 2021 at 10:54 am)K-PopPowerBottom69 Wrote: Inductive arguments do start from empirical observation of aspects of design/fine-tuning, etc.
Did you actually preform a series of tests, collected data and found evidence for this to be the case? Or did you just assume it was so because Josh Shitstain said, cars were made by people, therefore everything in the world must be intelligently designed. If you have actual research and data that shows everything on earth was intellegantly designed, then present it. If not then save yourself the embarassement.
And even if things were intellegantly designed (though science has already proven otherwise) what proof do you have that your imaginary friend did it? For all you know all this was created by Zordon from the planet Eltar.
Just because humans and animals can make things, it doesn't mean everything was created by a being.
(July 3, 2021 at 10:54 am)K-PopPowerBottom69 Wrote: The reason why God's existence can appear impossible to fully articulate is probably because it's the most self-evident fact, such that trying to reach it begs its truth.
So your "logic" is basically God is impossible to understand, therefore, that is enough proof that he is real. I've heard this strawman time and time again. It's litterally on the same level as "God works in mysterious ways".


![[Image: 6QOh5df.jpg]](https://i.imgur.com/6QOh5df.jpg)