(July 2, 2021 at 5:03 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(July 2, 2021 at 3:04 pm)Drich Wrote: do you really need me to address the mundane poorly thought out question you presented? because once i do my op here addresses the crux of the issue. Something several other posters have already touched on.
To answer your op, the people are 'bothered here' are not those in the church but those outside of the church. As most do not care that God forbids such a relationship. you people are the one's with a chip, because you assume the position that the church/god has no say in your life. and you will say do quote anything of authority to demonstrate this.
So now that i took the time to directly answer your op, your return volly will double down and prove what i said. then you can now go back and reread my op for that answer.
sorry to skip ahead.. i can do this with some people but i forgot who it was i was speaking with. your avatar should be a sufficient reminder that i need to hold your hand and slowly explain through everything. other wise you get angry confused and lost.
none.. Gentics have less than 0 affect on homosexuality. Clear enough? want to ask a follow up?
no?
the allow me to preface this statement.
Your question is not the same as asking "drich do you think i can find some tertiary article that contradicts you? or Drich do you think i can find some report funded by a special interest group that proves you wrong?" I am sure you can. both accounts.. but again sport finish my op... Just as the excuse for fat shaming is "genetics don't put donuts in your mouth" your non existent gay gene/genetics do even less.
for the record i DO NOT CARE what gay people do. So long as they do not teach it as being scripturally acceptable. which is not limited to gay people. any sin taught as permissible gets the same response. my view is if your going to sin, there is no need to hid or pretend it's ok. just sin.. tell yourself whatever you like. tell yourself there is no go there is no sin, just don't lie to yourself and say this is not sin in the eyes of god. as there is no way back from that.
That's not the offer. The offer is PM me your email address and i will send the patent that was filed which includes the number, and all the other paper work including lawyer and correspondence stating the file was accepted and was available to be licensed. so long as none of that info is shared personal business or otherwise.
because the patent number means nothing without confirmation that it is my patent. the filing paper work proves this. but again far too much personal info to post or share openly.
you can confirm it is all legit, do not share details.
Sorry I missed your full offer. Even sorrier that I now have to decline (I’m more than a little tetchy about giving out my email address).
But all those sundry documents wouldn’t be necessary. The patent number would allow me to look up your patent, which would have your name on it - according to US patent law, an inventor cannot opt out of being named in the patent.
Boru
Well, I pointed that out. I posted a patent of mine. Drich just will not do it. Drich wants someone to PM him an email.
Great, I did. We shall see if he is even vaguely honest. Or a flood of religious spam which is what I expect.
