(July 8, 2021 at 8:33 pm)Brian37 Wrote: You must mistake me for someone who gives a fuck.hey dummy, you do give enough fucks to have started and maintain this thread/discussion. you can't bail on your own topic.
Quote:Knowing firearms are dangerous IS HOW EVERYONE SHOULD VIEW THEM, BECAUSE THEY FUCKING ARE!actually sport guns by themselves are as dangerous as a club or hammer. it's the bullets that makes them dangerous.
Quote:Problem is just like drinking and driving and fireworks, idiots get complacent.so what are you the thought police? you gonna to take away cars next, because you think someone is complacent?
Quote:Again, there is no political party or religious oath required to purchase or own a firearm. So if you agree I should not be allowed to own a firearm, by today's laws you could not stop me.again dummy as a gun store owner, and if i don't like you or if i get a bad vib from you i can indeed stop you from purchasing at my store and if i think you to be a threat or a danger to yourself (EI if you have radical political views) then i am obligated to report you, to the ATF, and they will put you on a list that should halt you from buying a legal firearm anywhere in the country, till you have been investigated. and again even if you pass your back ground and this investigation I and every other gun store owner have the ability to refuse a sale to anyone for any reason.
Quote:FYI, after WW1 the allies, including America, after defeating Germany in WW1 put heavy restrictions on civilian firearm ownership.Ah... no. it was done in the us in 1934. via a $200 tax, and in 1985 where no new autos that would be allow to be manufactured.
Quote: It was Hitler who relaxed civilian firearm ownership, but for party loyalists only.Again, no. in the beginning they took all firearms from everyone. but once party was established they relaxed the laws for military and nazi party MEMBERS (Indoctrinated sworn in party loyalists, basically anyone who would defend the nazis.)
Quote:So by your own post above, what you are arguing is that only party loyalists whom agree with you should be allowed to own firearms.
again no, i am agreeing with you. i'm saying if you and your political affiliations say none of you should own firearms, then none of you should. in that you are telling the rest of us that you are incompetent or unable to safely own let alone safely or purposefully discharge a firearm.
