Ill give him some leeway:
He wont need to defend something he doesent believe in (truth of hadiths).
What he needs to defend is: WHY he thinks he is right and some 90% are wrong in accepting them Hadiths.
I find it amusing that he believes in Quran and not in Allah (the great, wise, PBUH, etc, pp, et al). Of course he thinks the Quran is the verbal excrement of this very deity mentioned, which, again, he should provide evidence for.....but wont/cant.
So all we are left again with is: Lots of (lukewarm) air from a fundamentalist believer.
He wont need to defend something he doesent believe in (truth of hadiths).
What he needs to defend is: WHY he thinks he is right and some 90% are wrong in accepting them Hadiths.
I find it amusing that he believes in Quran and not in Allah (the great, wise, PBUH, etc, pp, et al). Of course he thinks the Quran is the verbal excrement of this very deity mentioned, which, again, he should provide evidence for.....but wont/cant.
So all we are left again with is: Lots of (lukewarm) air from a fundamentalist believer.
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse
