Not insane, very clever though on all levels. In one sense I agree with DP. I also admire some of his work. The Kalam is perhaps one of the more creditable attempts to reason to a god, thoroughly researched and well defended. It is not remotely convincing however.
I wish he said this stuff in formal debates, it's embarrassing and bat shit crazy. I wonder what he really believes? He must know his arguments, whilst seductive to those who a theistically inclined, are all flawed and not convincing to atheists at all.
I wish he said this stuff in formal debates, it's embarrassing and bat shit crazy. I wonder what he really believes? He must know his arguments, whilst seductive to those who a theistically inclined, are all flawed and not convincing to atheists at all.
"I still say a church steeple with a lightning rod on top shows a lack of confidence"...Doug McLeod.
