(October 9, 2021 at 2:18 pm)vulcanlogician Wrote:
Nice video for anyone with 10 or so minutes to spare.
But something she said really irks me: "The word 'skeptical' has suffered in recent years because a lot of science-deniers now claim to be 'skeptics.'"
And you know what? She's right. But I am loathe to call science-deniers skeptics. I think the skepticism inherent in science is way more rigorous than the skepticism of anti-vaxxers and such. And that's why I don't want to call these people skeptics. It's skepticism without rigor. And that hardly counts as skepticism at all in my book.
What do you think? Do science-deniers qualify as skeptics?
They absolutely do not qualify as skeptics. As you stated skepticism is a rigorous discipline applied to the world around you to ensure that you only accept what can be proven. Those who are science-deniers are nothing more than ignorant people who refuse to do any of the work required to be actual skeptics.