Kyle Rittenhouse Trial

[Angrboda]

No, I'm reprimanding you for claiming something that was false as well as being stupid enough to conclude that you were the only one based on you being the only one who opined in favor of Rittenhouse.  That's shitty thinking.  And that we're here, still debating whether or not it's shitty thinking, simply goes further to solidify your reputation as an illogical nutball with shit for brains.  If you had claimed that you were the only person who opined in favor of Rittenhouse's acquittal, that would have been a different statement, and I still would have had legitimate complaints.  Concluding anything based upon who chose to participate in a thread does nothing to support your belief that you were some special flower because you have no way of knowing if those who expressed their opinions were a good representation of all of us here or not.  The squeaky wheel gets the grease.  If you only count squeaky wheels, you're gonna end up underestimating the number of wheels.   So that's another thinking error.  Honestly, fallacies and cognitive biases run in and out of your thinking like trains at Grand Central Station.  As to whether things have changed, I know that I have gotten more willing to give voice to unpopular opinions over the years, so your paranoid scenario doesn't ring true with me.  Generalizations are built on evidence.  Given that you appear to be a nutter with shitty thinking skills, I'm not willing to accept a generalization which appears based on nothing more than stories and talking points about the intimidation of the woke mob.  Lacking any actual evidence, I suspect this is just you projecting your fantasies onto reality yet again.

lol wut? Seriously?

Ok. I will rephrase what I posted before. I was the only one to put in writing my support of Rittenhouse and him acting in self defense, and I was correct, and I was called a nazi for it. Better?

No, for the reasons already explained in the post to which you are replying. Seriously, can you not read? And it's also false as I recently posted that I was willing to give Rittenhouse the benefit of the doubt. So you were wrong both in what you were implying -- that you were alone in thinking Rittenhouse deserved acquittal -- and in the literal truth of what you wish you had said -- because I had in fact spoken up. Even after moving the goalposts you still missed. And you wonder why you have no credibility.