RE: Kyle Rittenhouse Trial
November 24, 2021 at 5:16 am
(This post was last modified: November 24, 2021 at 5:17 am by Irreligious Atheist.)
(November 24, 2021 at 5:13 am)Helios Wrote:Quote:Going after your gun is as good as having a gun. At that point, you have to assume it's kill or be killed. You have a legal right to defend yourself and neutralize the threat, which is why Kyle was found not guilty. Quit with the buzzwords like "unarmed". If you're going for someone's gun, you're a second away from being armed and you know it. QuitNope going for the gun means nothing. He didn't weapon period.
(November 24, 2021 at 5:11 am)Fake Messiah Wrote: You're speaking as if he was in a war zone.Also, it doesn't matter who went for the gun he was still unarmed.
I care less than zero that they were "unarmed". A meaningless buzzword and nothing more when not put into proper context.
(November 24, 2021 at 5:11 am)Fake Messiah Wrote:(November 24, 2021 at 5:08 am)Irreligious Atheist Wrote: Going after your gun is as good as having a gun. At that point, you have to assume it's kill or be killed. You have a legal right to defend yourself and neutralize the threat, which is why Kyle was found not guilty. Quit with the buzzwords like "unarmed". If you're going for someone's gun, you're a second away from being armed and you know it. Quit it.
You're speaking as if he was in a war zone.
What should Kyle have assumed the men's intentions were? To give him a hug or to shake his hand?