RE: Kyle Rittenhouse Trial
November 24, 2021 at 9:46 am
(This post was last modified: November 24, 2021 at 9:47 am by brewer.)
(November 24, 2021 at 1:31 am)Irreligious Atheist Wrote: I was the ONLY one here to get the verdict right, right after the shooting happened. It was beyond obvious from the start, but I was the only one. Just goes to show you, that on this website, it's about nothing but team sports. The facts don't matter. Even whackjob Ana Kasparian admitted she was wrong about this, but others just can't do it because of their pride.
It's irrelevant that Kyle "shouldn't have been there". If you want to change the laws of the country so a person can't legally walk down the street, any street they choose, then you are a clown, and against any and all freedom. Keep blaming the victim. Keep backing the vigilantees that threatened Kyle's life and forced him to go through this trauma.
It's too bad the attackers had to die, but when attacked, you need to neutralize the threat, which sometimes means that people are going to die. I actually couldn't imagine things turning out much better than they did. No other bystanders were shot by accident. Kyle got lucky and shot all of the correct people, and I don't know if you could ask for much more in this situation from anyone, let alone a young guy like Mr. Rittnehouse. Bravo to Kyle for his nice shooting. Hopefully he goes after the lying MSM and tries to get some of that Nick Sandman money.
If you don't think the trial and verdict was politically based/biased you're missing something. The town (alderman) recruited an armed (untrained?) vigilante force on facebook prior to the protest, Kyle responded. The verdict is more about locals covering their ass than innocence.
If the trial was held in another jurisdiction where the judge and jury (and maybe prosecutor) had no ties to the community I doubt things would have ended as they did.
Can't find the conspiracy when you don't want to?
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
