Quote:Simple explanations are indeed to be preferred when they explain all the relevant phenomena. No philosophical system is complete. In your case, qualia and intentionality seem unaccounted for.That's rather presumptuous
Quote:Yes, you have these two independent systems. Except, you really don't have any reason for when they correspond or how that is possible. At some point you have to connect the phenomenal with the noumenal. IMHO that is not a satisfactory position.It's not satisfactory to you
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
