RE: Indoctrination
January 24, 2022 at 1:05 pm
(This post was last modified: January 24, 2022 at 1:10 pm by Mister Agenda.)
(January 22, 2022 at 11:26 am)Ahriman Wrote:(January 22, 2022 at 10:23 am)Mister Agenda Wrote: Why?Believers often, knowingly, lack evidence for God's existence. So a lack of evidence isn't exclusive to atheists.
Perhaps being unsatisfied with believing something despite a lack of evidence is.
(January 22, 2022 at 1:01 pm)Ahriman Wrote: Well there are different types of evidence. The evidence of a believer is faith-based evidence, meaning it's not empirical evidence, but still a valid form of evidence.
One of the things that tells us evidence of something is valid is whether it's persuasive to people who aren't already convinced of it.
(January 22, 2022 at 1:10 pm)Ahriman Wrote: What if a person has an extra-sensory (beyond 5 senses) experience in a way that can be measured using scientific tools, would you consider that evidence for something supernatural?
If a person has psychic perceptions that can be tested and measured using scientific tools, I would consider that evidence for psychic perceptions. I'm not sure I could still consider that supernatural if science can detect and measure it.
(January 22, 2022 at 5:59 pm)Ahriman Wrote:(January 22, 2022 at 5:54 pm)Jehanne Wrote: That's an easy one. I'll flip a coin 100 times, recording the exact sequence of heads/tails. You, via your extrasensory ability, email me the outcome (especially, in advance); we'll compare.Yeah that's not at all how that works.
Yah, it would only work like that if it actually worked.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.