GN. He's very possibly is a rashist or a racist, or a bad apologist. He's not a Russian apologist though. He's not even really shifting the blame to the West for Russia invading Ukraine. In context (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article...6429380587) . He does say that the US supporting Ukraine fans the flames of war, which is accurate. He also unilaterally condemned Putin's actions, which is good and not something who supports Putin would do. Then he drew correlations with his usual crudites of cultural war, usual spiel. My trivial hang up was on a grammatical faux pas that spurred me into thought of truth in headlines.
Are headlines like this intentional, a sign of bias, poor grammar, or most likely designed as click-bate?
Besides, your argument is ridiculous. claiming he isn't taking responsibility, while at the same time he's blaming the West (US and Canada specifically) is a little wonky wouldn't you say? Unless of course you believe that he is a Russian and an apologist.
Are headlines like this intentional, a sign of bias, poor grammar, or most likely designed as click-bate?
Besides, your argument is ridiculous. claiming he isn't taking responsibility, while at the same time he's blaming the West (US and Canada specifically) is a little wonky wouldn't you say? Unless of course you believe that he is a Russian and an apologist.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
