(July 22, 2022 at 1:25 pm)Billy Bob Wrote:(July 22, 2022 at 1:09 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: You don't have to be ignorant to use an argument from ignorance. Your assertions aren't evidence and don't require evidence to dismiss, they require evidence to accept. Admitting what you don't know something is not ignorance or weakness, it's intellectual integrity.
"You don't have to be ignorant to use an argument from ignorance."
That didn't get around the evidence I gave.
"Your assertions aren't evidence and don't require evidence to dismiss, they require evidence to accept."
They were not assertions, they are laws of science. You can lie all you want to but it does not change the science.
"Admitting what you don't know something is not ignorance or weakness, it's intellectual integrity."
I gave laws only science fiction people ignore, which is you. We KNOW those laws following what science showed by them being observable, repeatable, and falsifiable, but YOU want to ignore them and remain ignorant. You claiming that I'm the ignorant one is just an.....assertion. I give science, you give assertions.
You're clearly showing you are a joke regarding integrity.
On evidence, you haven't provided any so there is nothing to get around. Provide us with any evidence that god better explains reality than all of the discoveries of scienceand we can start talking. But remember, since science started to get going properly over the last 400 years, the phenomena attributed to god by religion has been ever shrinking.
Oh and on integrity, you wouldn't know about it if it upped and bit you on the arse, so don't presume to lecture us about not having any.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Home