Why does science always upstage God?

[Billy Bob]

You don't have to be ignorant to use an argument from ignorance. Your assertions aren't evidence and don't require evidence to dismiss, they require evidence to accept. Admitting what you don't know something is not ignorance or weakness, it's intellectual integrity.

"You don't have to be ignorant to use an argument from ignorance."

That didn't get around the evidence I gave. 

It gets around your accusation that I accused you of being ignorant.

"Your assertions aren't evidence and don't require evidence to dismiss, they require evidence to accept."

They were not assertions, they are laws of science. You can lie all you want to but it does not change the science.

You assert that the laws of science support your conclusions, but they do not.

"Admitting what you don't know something is not ignorance or weakness, it's intellectual integrity."

I gave laws only science fiction people ignore, which is you. We KNOW those laws following what science showed by them being observable, repeatable, and falsifiable, but YOU want to ignore them and remain ignorant. You claiming that I'm the ignorant one is just an.....assertion. I give science, you give assertions. 

You're clearly showing you are a joke regarding integrity. 

Again you've latched onto the notion that I'm asserting that you are ignorant when I've said nothing of the kind.

"It gets around your accusation that I accused you of being ignorant."
I'm following science; you're not. I'm not the one that is ignorant; you are.
"You assert that the laws of science support your conclusions, but they do not."
Then why can't you get around them? Because you can't so you fill in space.
"Again you've latched onto the notion that I'm asserting that you are ignorant when I've said nothing of the kind."

Without going back on other pages, was it you that brought up the argument from ignorance? I believe I was going by what we KNOW and you don't want to face what we know. You want to throw out all we know and just say we don't know. Then you know nothing. You have to follow that all the way through. You can say we don't really know 2 + 2 = 4. Just throw out what we know. You can do that with anything. Then be that way. Be a brat that if you don't like what the evidence shows, just claim we don't know yet. It's your life and I don't care.